Your robot has 47 cross-domain dependencies.
You're tracking zero of them.
A co-pilot that captures interface contracts from engineering conversations — so you catch integration failures before hardware respins.
IMU says NED. Nav stack expects ENU. Found out when the EKF diverged. Three days lost.
Swapped the LiDAR. SLAM broke. Nobody tracked which perception params depended on the old spec.
Firmware update added a byte to the CAN message. Driver parsed garbage. Robot arm went to wrong position.
These aren't bugs. They're invisible dependencies between layers that no tool tracks.
Join the waitlist
What your toolchain doesn't track.
rosdep tracks package deps. Docker isolates environments. tf2 manages transforms.
None of them track: "Why is this parameter 0.8? Who decided? What breaks if it changes?"
We track the decision graph — the interface contracts between your hardware and software layers.
How it works.
Step 1
Talk about what you're building
Sensor stack, actuator integration, system architecture — describe it in plain language.
Step 2
The co-pilot captures what matters
Interface contracts, assumptions, and parameter decisions — captured into a dependency graph as you talk.
Step 3
Change something — see the blast radius
Swap a sensor, update firmware, change a parameter. Instantly see every decision and interface affected.